Archives

All posts for the day May 20th, 2012

President Barack Obama sits with Ghana's President John Atta Mills, right, and President Yayi Boni of Benin during a luncheon on Food Security at the G-8 Summit at Camp David, MD

President Barack Obama sits with Ghana’s President John Atta Mills, right, and President Yayi Boni of Benin during a luncheon on Food Security at the G-8 Summit at Camp David, MD., on Saturday, May 19, 2012. (AP /Charles Dharapak)

The Associated Press

Date: Sunday May. 20, 2012 10:00 AM ET

NEW YORK — The Group of Eight world leaders has warned North Korea that it faces more sanctions if it continues to threaten the stability of the region with provocative acts such as its failed long-range rocket launch in April.

The U.S., Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Russia and Britain issued a declaration on the results of the two-day summit. It includes a statement about the G-8′s concerns over North Korea’s nuclear program, including its uranium enrichment program.

“We affirm our will to call on the UN Security Council to take action, in response to additional (North Korea) acts, including ballistic missile launches and nuclear tests,” the declaration reads.

North Korea’s state media didn’t immediately respond to the G-8′s warning.

The United Nations Security Council imposed sanctions against North Korea after its first nuclear test in 2006 and stepped up sanctions after its second test in 2009, hoping to derail the country’s rogue nuclear weapons and ballistic missile programs.

North Korea earlier this month threatened to bolster its nuclear arsenal at any cost.

President Barak Obama said Saturday that world leaders also made progress at Camp David presidential retreat in Maryland on other international issues at the summit, including on Iran and Syria.

 

Source:http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/Politics/20120520/G8-north-korea-sanctions-120520/

About these ads

IN SPACE - OCTOBER 28:  In this handout from the Solar & Heliospheric Observatory, a major solar eruption is shown in progress October 28, 2003. This X18 flare is the strongest flare since August 16, 1989 when a X20 flare occurred. A large coronal mass ejection (CME) has been hurled towards the Earth and could hit the Earth's magnetosphere by October 30. The CME is seen as a white circle around the sun in this image. Until the orientation of the magnetic field in this cloud is known, the severity of the Geomagnetic Storm will be unknown. If the cloud has a southward-directed magnetic field it will be severe, but if it has a northward component it will not affect the Earth that much. The eruption also accelerated a high-energy proton shower, which can cause damage to satellites and can be harmful for astronauts.  (Photo by Solar & Heliospheric Observatory/NASA via Getty Images)

NASA/GETTY IMAGES

The after-effects of solar eruptions like this one could harm our power systems, the author says.

If you live in the lower 48 states, you have probably never seen the Northern Lights. This spectacular display is generated when high energy particles from the sun collide with atoms in the high atmosphere, creating undulating waves of multicolored light arrayed along the lines of the earth’s magnetic field.

This phenomenon, Aurora Borealis, is common in polar regions, but rarely seen elsewhere. And that is a good thing, because when the aurora moves south, it is the sign of a solar storm — an event caused by a massive solar flare that, for all its beauty, can have disastrous consequences for our electric grid.

For example, a solar storm in March 1989 caused a blackout in Quebec that left millions of people without electricity for nine hours and cost the region an estimated $2 billion, closing hospitals and halting trading on Toronto’s stock market.

This may have been a preview of what lies in store for us in the next couple of years, as sun activity is expected to steadily increase, reaching its maximum strength in 2013, according to a forecast issued by NASA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

Solar activity peaks every 11 years, sending waves of charged particles careening toward the Earth at speeds of about 600 miles per second. Much of this energy is absorbed by the upper atmosphere, but some of it gets through and hits the surface of the Earth — fortunately at levels too low to cause direct damage to humans.

It can, however, interfere with the high-power transmission lines that crisscross the U.S.

Read More:http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/a-sunny-day-avoid-article-1.1080915?localLinksEnabled=false

Protesters against the NATO summit will put forward a different vision for society.

FIFTY HEADS of state are on their way to Chicago for the May 20-21 summit of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). The world’s most powerful military alliance will meet behind barricades and swarms of riot police and National Guard troops to discuss their strategies for continuing and extending the West’s military domination of the world.

Meanwhile, thousands of protesters will march in dissent–though menaced by riot police, sound cannons and other obstacles designed to hamper their First Amendment right to free speech and assembly. For months, the city of Chicago has stoked fears of “a special breed of protester” hell-bent on mayhem and violence. News reports have been filled with warnings that “regular people” who work in downtown office buildings should avoid business attire so that they don’t become targets of protesters’ anger.

But the reality is that the “regular people” of all types are the ones who will be marching. Among the many groups planning to join the permitted mass march on May 20 are teachers, transit workers, students, nurses, religious leaders, Occupy activists, community groups, immigrant rights groups and environmentalists.

The people in Chicago this coming weekend who really ought to be feared are the NATO leaders themselves–especially if your origins are in the Middle East. Among them are war criminals responsible for civilian deaths, torture and the use of chemical weapons, such as white phosphorous in Afghanistan. Unlike the protesters, the war-makers who will gather at the summit have at their disposal the most lethal and sophisticated means of destruction on earth–and they aren’t afraid to use them.

NATO leaders will congratulate themselves on their commitment to “peace” and “security,” but the truth is that they are preparing for new and aggressive campaigns to dominate whole regions of the world. They will herald the end of NATO’s decade-long war in Afghanistan, even as they sign agreements to allow the U.S. and other NATO countries to keep tens of thousands of troops in Afghanistan for a dozen more years.

NATO insists such measures are necessary to ensure “our security.” But they never talk about how their idea of security rests on people dying under drone assaults, massacres and bombing runs. Or how the massive burden of military spending requires deep cuts in social services that imperil the lives of countless people in NATO countries like the U.S. and around the world.

- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -

THE U.S. national security apparatus is mobilizing astonishing numbers of police for the NATO summit–and creating an atmosphere of fear meant to permeate the city of Chicago.

“Police officers from Philadelphia, Milwaukee and Charlotte-Mecklenburg, N.C.; will assist the Chicago Police Department in handling thousands of protesters expected to descend on Chicago for this weekend’s NATO summit,” according to the Chicago Sun-Times.

More than 500 National Guard troops will be activated alongside 3,100 Chicago police assigned to NATO security and 700 Illinois state troopers. The total number of armed personnel in Chicago this weekend could top 5,000.

The cost of the summit is officially estimated at $55 million, but the actual costs of hosting such summits usually exceed the projections. Mayor Rahm Emanuel has attempted to mute criticism of the outlandish expense of hosting the summit by insisting that it won’t cost taxpayers because city officials are appealing to “corporate citizens” to cover the costs through donations.

Read More:http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=30938

 

 

By Miriam Raftery

May 19, 2012 (San Diego’s East County) – A federal judge has ruled that section 1021 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 is unconstitutional, violating the First Amendment of the Constitution by having a chilling effect on free speech.

The clause allowed the U.S. military to arrest and indefinitely detain anyone—even U.S. citizens—for providing substantial support to terrorist groups.  Civil libertarians opposed the clause and journalists filed suit, arguing that the definition was so vague that reporters and political activists feared they could be indefinitely detained.

Katherine Forest, U.S. District Judge in New York, made the ruling on Wednesday. Government lawyers had tried to argue that the plaintiffs lacked standing to sue, but Judge Forest found that they did.

The plaintiffs include Chris Hedges, Pulitzer Prize winner and former New York Times foreign correspondent. Hodges said he feared detention if he interviewed sources in the Middle East.  Alexa O’Brien, a Wikileaks supporter, said she withheld publication of interviews with Guantanamo detainees due to fear of the new law.

Others cited fears that activist groups such as the Occupy movement or even some environmentalists could be deemed terrorist organizations that might subject members to rendition for indefinite detention.

Among San Diego’s Congressional representatives, Duncan Hunter, Brian Bilbray,  Darrell Issa and Susan Davis voted for the NDAA. (Bob Filner did not vote.)  Senators Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein also voted for the measure, which provided funding for U.S. military operations.

On Thursday, following the Judge’s ruling, Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.) introduced an amendment to remove the indefinite detention language. Congresswoman Susan Davis voted for the amendment, but Duncan Hunter, Brian Bilbray, and Darrell Issa voted against removing the indefinite detention clause.  The amendment failed by a 182-283 vote.

The Judge’s ruling is subject to appeal.

 

Source:http://eastcountymagazine.org/node/9734

Washington D.C. – The U.S. House of Representatives Friday passed the 2013 National Defense
Authorization Act [NDAA] which includes a total of $369 million dollars in spending requests for both on base and civilian infrastructure projects on Guam.
Congresswoman Madeleine Bordallo says the measure authorizes just over $101-million dollars in military spending on island, as well as an additional $128 million for the Guam Strike Fuel Cell Maintenance Hangar. It also maintains the President’s budget request for $139.4 million in greater federal assistance for infrastructure improvements on Guam.

The Act does not include the roughly $100 million in World War II reparations sought by Bordallo. Her bill, H.R. 44, the Guam World War II Loyalty Recognition Act, was blocked by the GOP controlled Rules Committee Thursday.

The measure now faces a much higher hurddle in the U.S. Senate.

The Senate Armed Services Committee is expected to begin consideration of their version of the defense bill next week. The Committee is Chaired by Senator Carl Levin and the ranking Republican is Senator John McCain. Senator Jim Webb also sits on the Committee.

Those 3 Senators have been critical of the cost of the Guam buildup. They were the architects of the current freeze on buildup funding for Guam. That freeze remains in effect until DoD submits a master plan for the proposed realignment of forces in East Asia and more precises estimates on just how much it will cost.

Once the Senate Armed Services Committee issues its version of the NDAA and the full Senate approves it, the House and Senate versions will be reconciled in a Conference Committee later this year.

Fiscal Year 2013 Military Construction Authorization of Appropriations

Service

Project

Cost

Marine Corps

North Ramp Utilities Increment 2 (AAFB)

$ 25,904,000

DLA

Upgrade Fuel Pipeline

$ 67,500,000

ARNG

Guam National Guard Joint Force HDQ Ph4

$ 8,500,000

TOTAL

$ 101,904,000

READ the release from Congresswoman Bordallo in FULL below:

House Passes National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE – May 18, 2012 – Washington, D.C. –

Read more:Mhttp://www.pacificnewscenter.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=23772:house-passes-national-defense-authorization-act-for-fiscal-year-2013&catid=45:guam-news&Itemid=156

BIGFOOT DISCOVERY PROJECTA sculpture at the Bigfoot Discovery Museum in Felton, Calif., surmises that he’s a family man.

A bigfoot’s howl is multidimensional: a deep and undulating whoop that starts low and ends in a high, feral squeal or resolves completely, like a siren. The first time I unleashed one, while crouching on a bluff overlooking the eastern bank of the Apalachicola River, Matt Moneymaker — who, moments earlier, had loosed a robust, commanding shriek that echoed through the valley — responded with a hearty guffaw.

“I have a cold,” I mumbled by way of an excuse. It was almost 2 a.m., and we were huddled in the dark in Torreya State Park near Bristol, in the Florida panhandle.

My craggy, toadlike holler yielded no response.

Moneymaker is the founder and president of the Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization (bfro.net), a group of Bigfoot investigators dedicated to acquiring “conclusive documentation of the species’ existence.” Bigfoots, also known as sasquatches or yetis, are famously elusive — if they exist at all. Since 2000, the organization has hosted research expeditions — including some open to nonmembers — to suspected Bigfoot habitats across North America.

 

The goal is to rouse and record a Bigfoot. The trips — which typically last four days and cost $300 to $500 (not including airfare, camping equipment or food) — are led by an investigator affiliated with the Bigfoot organization who is native to the region. They center on nightly jaunts through the woods.

Read More:http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/travel/2012/05/20/1-enthusiasts-hot-on-trail-of-bigfoot-in-florida.html

Published on 19 May 2012 by sangstar1
What is Coming Our? Is It A Planet? This Object Is Getting Much Brighter Than When I First Spot It. Could It Be Because It I Getting Closer To Our Sun? Moreover, My Gut Feeling Tells Me That This Object Is Huge. Anyone from NASA Care To Explain It? Just As Long As They Do not Manipulate the Data.

There have been an “unprecedented” number of UFO sightings reported in the North Island over the past two months, UFO watchers say.

And aliens may even have visited Northland in the past five weeks, with one man reporting seeing a UFO land in the region, Suzanne Hansen, director from Ufocus NZ research network said.

She said: “He’s a very credible source. He saw an object that had landed and said it was definitely not an aircraft or like anything else he had seen.

“I’ve got 30 (UFO/UAP) reports on my desk at the moment from the upper North Island and Northland from the past couple of weeks that we’re yet to process [on top of the many others] … It’s unprecedented.”

Maungakaramea resident Charles Gillard reported seeing strange lights hovering above the Tangihua ranges just after 4am yesterday.

Mr Gillard said the white and blueish lights were definitely not a helicopter or plane and darted about at speed for several minutes before simply vanishing.

Read More:http://www.bayofplentytimes.co.nz/news/ufo-alarm-sounds-around-north-island/1386559/

Published on 19 May 2012 by NASAtelevision
The scheduled May 19th launch of the SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket and Dragon spacecraft on the first commercial venture to the International Space Station was aborted with t-minus zero-point-five seconds left in the countdown. Early data shows that high chamber pressure in Engine #5 caused a cutoff of all nine engines at T- 0.5 seconds. SpaceX will continue to look at the data and inspect the engine before setting a new launch date. The next possible opportunity is May 22 from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida. Meanwhile, the three newest residents of the International Space Station were greeted by their Expedition 31 crewmates after their Soyuz capsule docked safely with the orbiting laboratory following its two day-plus journey from Kazakhstan. Soyuz commander Gennady Padalka, NASA flight engineer Joe Acaba, and Russian flight engineer Sergei Revin are slated to spend the next five months on the station. Expedition 31 will conclude, and 32 will begin, when Oleg Kononenko, Andre Kuipers, and Don Pettit return to Earth on July first after spending more than six months aboard the ISS. Also, Extreme Temperature Heat Shield, More Tests for Orion’s Launch System Component, The State of Alabama celebrates NASA and more.